How it that some can claim that legal pornographys toxic when no scientific bear witness has been discovered to support such claims? The close is because these individuals listen to the falls allegations made against pornography by the perform building and other conservative groups and individuals in our society, and overtime these individuals grow to debate these false allegations. I how eer believe that legal pornography is non harmful, and those that say otherwise are only stressful to deceive the public.
So who is trustworthy for push button the idea that pornography is harmful? Unfortunately this is not an easy question to answer. There is not a single person or organization that is responsible for pushing this false idea. However, there are a a few(prenominal) organizations and individuals in our society that hold the most responsibility for pushing this notion. The first and probably most responsible is the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church essentials you to believe that pornography is a sin, and anyone who views it is almost sure as shooting going to hell. The members of the church building make ridiculous claims such as: pornography is the work of the devil and pornography is evil. In 1998, Bishop Paul Johnson stated that pornography is satanic and a instrumental role used by the devil. My question to Mr.
Johnson is: how can he make these statements when he has no evidence what so ever to back them up with? The obvious answer is that he cant.
So if these members of the church do not have any documented evidence that pornography is harmful, why do they make such claims to begin with? Why do they waste their time on qualification allegations against pornography based only on opinions? The answer to that is control. The members of the church are smart enough to realize that pornography goes against everything...
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment