This is a essay that I wrote after reading A Man for All Seasons -
Was Sir Tomas mores decision correct?
        There ar often many different ways to look at situations. Usually when situations are viewed from different points of view, differing opinions can be found. In A Man for All Seasons there are understandably a lot of opinions or so Mores silence to the oath essential by the act of succession. In the play the church is correspond by the Spanish ambassador. He interprets Mores silence as a gesture of allegiance to the Catholic church and as a belief in the Popes power. The conjure up be by the force and his followers are furious that More is not intact hartedly supporting him in his act of supremacy. Finally, Mores family simply wants him to stay alive. Was More correct? Depending on which view point Mores decision is looked at from, either the Church, the State or Mores family there are differing opinions about his correctness.
        In the eyes of the church Mores pull throughs, or lack of action as the case may be, was looked upon very favourably. Catholics desire that the pope has the power to make rulings on points of religion and morality. The pope believed that the state had no business meddling in the affairs and powers of the church.
hence when the Pope declared that the marriage between Catherine and Henry would stand, he was enforcing a law within the church that his followers would dupe to live by. Therefore from the point of view of the catholic church, which was represented in the play by Chapuys, Mores decision was correct. For if one believes, as More did, in an everlasting sole and the catholic meter reading of life & death then you must believe that More did...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment