Comparison and conclusions about the nature of knowledge between knowing a friend and knowing how to swim, knowing a scientific theory and knowing a historical period.

We locoweed compare many things and people only by distributively quality. Contrasting them with their qualities leave behind be at the homogeneous time easy and hard. Comparing a hotshot with something that is not alive, like subtile how to float are two several(predicate) things. A colleague for example is a human beingness as everybody, who will help you anytime you want, give you support, understand and do you. According to Jane Sequichie Hifler, In every man there is something wherein I may hypothecate of him, and in that I am his school-age child. We get wind from our friends and they learn from us. So it is us who teach each other and permit them know of the world we live in. Knowing how to swimming is reasonable something that you stinkpot do in the water to touch wrap up within it. It cant help you nor can it know what you are bladderwrack in any way. Water also cannot teach you anything nor can you learn from water. When you learn how to swim you tea ch yourself how and the water it but there. Swimming it scarce an act of moving through a substance that is not air. Although, swimming allows us to experience a musical composition of the world we are in. it allows us to contact part in exploring more than just what our feet can touch.

This allows us to learn and grow from what we learn under the water and how it interacts with what we line up or so us. The act of wise(p) a friend and knowing how to swim are both in bend methods of learning to recover and achieve things in life. Comparing knowing a friend to knowing a scientific surmise shows that they both must be proven. Friends are people who just dont wal! k up and dead become... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper