Critically assess the effects of corporate separate personality.

Different legal identity from its members

 

One in the most essential outcomes of corporate separate personality is how the company assumes a separate identity from that of its members. Even if a business is owned outright by one shareholder, the business has a entirely separate personality from that individual. This can be confirmed by the leading case of Salomon v A. Salomon & Co Ltd where the Household of Lords held how the company’s acts were its own acts, not those people of Mr Salomon personally. As being a result, Mr Salomon was not personally liable for his company’s debts. It is worth noting, however, that the Court did recognise that there would be situations wherever they would be prepared to move away from that principle and ‘lift the veil of incorporation’ and discover people liable where they had acted dishonestly, fraudulently or unreasonably.

2) Limited liability

 

Due towards fact how the business is really a separate legal individual, it follows that its members do not normally be liable for its debts and obligations. This gives the shareholders a great level of security, because it methods that they can profit inside the successes on the company while becoming safe inside the knowledge that their personal liability is limited to the value of the shares they have purchased. On the other hand it must be noted that those people members who participate during the management of the company usually do not necessarily be protected from very own liability. In addition, the notion of limited liability may not be attractive to capacity creditors who may need far more security for their loan.

3) Ownership of Property

 

Where a business holds residence in its own name, this belongs solely the company and also the shareholders have no proprietary rights (other than for the importance in the shares they hold). This gives shareholders and employees additional security than if a director chose to leave his position and was able to enforce a sale and division of any company property or assets he owned. This position for that reason makes the shareholders’ investments more attractive and secure. However, this might be to the detriment of a trader who owned the company property just before incorporation but failed to subsequently assign the insurance policies to the company. This was illustrated in Macaura v Northern Assurance Co wherein Mr Macaura had insured timber under his own name and this was then destroyed by a fire. The insurance company refused to pay out on Mr Macaura’s claim, stating that he had no insurable interest within the timber since it was owned by the company. From the same way, a parent company doesn't have an insurable interest in its subsidiary companies, even in which they are wholly owned by it.

3) Transferable shares and transparency

 

The reality that a company is legally separate from its members facilitates the transfer of shares. The trouble of shares is regarded a fundamental ways of raising capital for your company (although tiny traders are always attracted by the concept of incorporation merely being a techniques to protect themselves from capacity unlimited liability). The exchange of shares on a open market also leads to transparency as it acts as an incentive for management to conduct the organization inside a reasonable manner. This transparency enables higher scrutiny by outsiders of the company’s affairs and reduces the opportunity for fraudulent behaviour, thereby improving the marketability of the shares. It also techniques that investors are able to acquire the requisite info they require in order to evaluate the company before entering into business transactions. Within the company’s factor of view, however, this transparency can usually trigger disclosure of information that they would have preferred to withhold and put them in a more vulnerable position with competitors.

4) Ability to sue and liability to be sued

 

The primary benefit to traders of incorporation may be the concept of limited liability; however, this can act towards the detriment of third party creditors who enter into transactions with the company. Though the creditors is going to be in a position to sue the business itself, they might not be able to recover their money if the company is insolvent. It ought to be noted also that a company is in a position to sue its debtors for non-payment. So it is a legal person which could both sue and be sued.

5) Perpetual succession

 

After getting legally produced by incorporation, a business can only subsequently be terminated by the law. Unlike people, firms are immortal and will continue to exist right after the exit or death of its members by the method of perpetual succession. Obviously a reduction in the number of members (particularly if they owned a substantial shareholding) may affect the business in terms of morale, profit levels, functioning, etc, but the true company itself will remain in existence. The only manner wherever a member is able to realise the importance of his shares upon leaving the business is by selling them to an additional individual – there is no entitlement to be bought out by the firm. Regardless of whether an individual’s shares are sold (or, if he died, then left to one more in his will), this don't affect the company itself. Shareholders from the business are simply agents of the company; they are able to occur and go without having affecting the company’s existence. Therefore, it's simpler and potentially much less harmful to remove a fraudulent or disreputable director from a company than a partnership (where that person would be able to jeopardise the corporation by taking with him any assets or capital that he owned). There's also higher security for employees mainly because they is not at risk of losing their jobs due to the death of their employer, as the business will continue to exist.

 

The rewards of incorporation to a sole trader or small partnership are obvious. The business will have higher access to capital, thereby increasing the business’s chances of prosperity.

 

In conclusion, the final results of corporate separate personality are far-reaching. A company is regarded a legal entity in its own correct and, as such, its members have limited liability for its debts and obligations. The business is able to individual residence in its very own name and problem shares to raise capital. It is able to sue debtors and similarly be sued by its creditors. Finally, a fundamental characteristic of corporate separate personality is that of perpetual succession, which results in a continuation on the company’s existence regardless of its members.

 

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!