Evaluation of America’s Cultural Influence on the World

Evaluation of the Statess Cultural Influence on the World. Jacqueline Gargiulo LIM College Abstract Culturally and politically, the States has a strong meeting on the institution. The influences of Matthew Parris and raja Shehadeh portray offensive behavior by the join States which has impacted younger generations of Palestine and European Countries. Where Shehadehs work, What We Think of the States (2), indicates both(prenominal) an admiration and anger towards the unite states, Parriss work, Its clip We All Signed Up for the Rest of the World Team, outlines a authorized negative towards the the States and what it stands for.Both articles suggest that the United States had forced its ideals on to the easing of the world. International perception about the United States seems to be generated both by Americas power and influence as well as from within the nations themselves. Parris refers to the United States as a hegemonic power that involves reign in where Shehadeh takes a more intimate approach and discusses a private exchange concerning a family members loss of original ethnicity. thither are many international voices represented in these works both positive and negative aspects are explored.Evaluation The world has a mixed sensible horizon of America. The United States is often seen as a hegemonic empire that looks to control the occupy of the world. American fashion, politics, media, and ideals are captivating to younger generations of foreign countries. The works of Matthew Parris, a South African born British political journalist, and raja Shehadeh, a Palestinian attorney and author on international and human rights and the kernel East, illustrate differing yet complementary views of Americas influence on the rest of the world.While some believe that America has a positive impact on society, others feel that America strips them of their ethnicity and value system. One negative pagan influence that America has had on Palestinians is refe renced in the paragraph by Shehadeh which think backs about country men who leave for America and return stripe of their heathen dress and their ethnic accent. Shehadeh (2002) writes, The few who precipitate back for picture summer visits parade up and down Main Street in their Bermudas and baseball hats, stopping at the ice cream parlour to reminisce with its proprietor in an old accent that you hardly ever control in Ramallah today (pg. 1). Shehadeh portrays admiration for the United States in respect to their advances in transportation and efficient pathway counselings in Ramallah, Palestine, while at the same age discusses the destruction to the states natural beauty and heritage. This is evidenced when Raja (2002) states Next came the need for new roads to connect them to Israel not the old British-style meandering roads provided American-style straight four-lane highways that cut through the hills that stood in the way (pg. 92).Shehadeh (2002) continues to explain t hat in the context of the Middle East conflict, roads whitethorn seem a small thing, but they have done a kind of spiritual damage. Gone is that attractive stretch of serpentine road that meandered downhill (pg. 92). Here, as America pushed its pagan influence upon the Middle East, geographic beauty has been lost and in its place convenience of travel has been placed. Hence, Raja Shehadehs oerall view of America is mixed. Matthew Pariss work can be viewed as extremist. His overall view of America and its cultural influence is negative.Parris (2003) explains, Today in that respect is only one hegemon, the United States of America but there is no less a need than existed during the coolness War for a wary defensiveness towards the appetite, the pretensions, and the dreams of a great and unchallenged power. If the U. S. bird of Jove is to be contained, collective action is needed by the smaller mammals (pg. 94). Here, Parris is proclaiming that America is a dominating influence ov er other nations and if they are to come out from under the influence of this overarching power, they must unite or be consumed.Matthew Parris (2003) furthers his argument by writing that As America grows more assured and its muscle and command, it volition be clashing again and again, not erect with old enemies but with drawer friends-over trade, the environment, pre-emptive deference, regime change, international law, extradition the list is speculative, but let us speculate. (pg. 96) . Parris uses the example of Britains own Prime government minister Tony Blair, who sided with the United States instead of standing on his own two feet. Tony Blair vox populi the tide over could be repaired and that he might be the bridgemaker. Now, he marooned on the other side and will have to take his chances there (Parris, 2003, pg. 97). Here, America seems to turn its back on Britain by alleviating the bridge that snare them, leaving Tony Blair and his country helpless. America is ove rconfident that they can repair the bridge when necessary, but for the mean time, make no attempts to do so. Parris also exposes Americas ambiguity over the war with Iraq. It is, however just accomplishable that failure will be faced.The peace in Iraq may launch dirtier than the war, and the American race ( as distinguished from their Defense Secretary) are incertain about empire and squeamish about becoming other nations ships officer (Parris, 2003, pg. 95) Parris is trying to tell us here that the United States has stepped beyond it leaping and is now responsible to take care of Iraq citizens. He further explains that the U. S. will have more accountability for the well being of Iraqs people because of the actions we have taken to stop the Iraq war.In conclusion, Matthew Parris is suggesting that the United States needs to be reigned in and that if this does not occur the hegemonic power, that is the United States will take over and become insoluble. With this, Matthew Parr iss view on Americas cultural influence on the world is overpoweringly negative. The international perception of the United States as an imposing, and influential power can be seen as each a negative or a positive. Because of its global connotation, it has become a source of analysis and scrutiny.Negatively, the United States is seen as a hegemony that needs taming and caging. Contrastingly, and on a positive note, the United States is influencing trade, transportation, economy, and education. America is influencing these factors towards other countries to try to intensify there knowledge and to further expose them to the possibilities that can be achieved by taking on the American way. One cannot view Americas positives as having no merit. There may be some form of jealousy that is masked by capitalizing on the negative power that is exerted by the United States. In onclusion, Americas cultural influence is in the beginning mixed as seen in the works of Matthew Parriss Its judg ment of conviction We All Signed Up for the Rest of the World Team, along with Raja Shehadehs What We Think of America (2). References Gumery, K. , (2007) International Views America and the Rest of the World. Glenview, paraplegic Pearson Education, Inc. Parris, Matthew, (2003) Its time we all signed up for the rest of the world team In Keith Gumery (Ed. ), International Views (pg. 94-97). New York Pearson Longman Shehadeh, Raja, (2002) What we think of America (2) In Keith Gumery (Ed. ), International Views (pg. 90-93). New York Pearson Longman