Running head : Privacy Rights and bid FreedomPrivacy Rights and Press FreedomName of StudentAffiliationName of ProfessorCourseDatePrivacy Rights and Press FreedomOftentimes , the homage is confronted with the issue : Which pay off demands greater protection , the right to privacy or the freedom of ex raiseion or of the press ? The so called balancing-of-interest doctrine gives the move the prerogative which right demands greater protection . In Lagunzad v . Sotto vda . De Gonzales (92 SCRA 476 , August 6 , l976 , the compulsory Court defined the rule of balancing-of-interest as a prescript which requires a Court to take conscious consideration of the interplay of interests apparent in a given type of situation . The Court further said that , when style touches upon nationals of essential clandestine engage , privacy right is paramount than freedom of expression (cited in Aquirre , l995 , 299 . There are other rules or limitations upon the freedom of expression , it essential however , be stressed that the Court in the exercise of its power of judicial review is not precluded from applying the set aside rule in a given case . In short a case will have to be decided with openness . Which rule to apply is a matter of judicial discretionThe essence of constitutional democracy is the protection of profound liberties . The Bill of Rights governs the blood between the individual and the State . Its concern is not the relation between the individuals , between a toffee-nosed individual and other individuals . The rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are generally say against the abuses of the regimen in the exercise of the massive powers it has at its command .
When the Court ruled that the proscription against unnatural lawful searches and seizures , it is directed only against the government and its agencies that are tasked with enforcement of the law and not against private personsDirectly interlaced with the right of the people against unreasonable searches and seizures is the right of parley and commensurateness This provision of the Constitution strengthens the privacy of men which must remain inviolable . The freedom of correspondence extends to convey virtuoso s views and sentiments . It whitethorn be through permitters , telegrams signals , cables , telephone or any mode not prohibited by law . A court cannot a lawyer to disclose or divulge matters belonging to his client which is a breach of the confidentiality of lawyer-client relationship . In the same way , a medical practician cannot impart to anybody the health record of a person without his licence . If so judicially decreed , the privilege of communication and correspondence may be violatedThe right of the people to be let alone can also be invoked by the government . The President can invoke executive privilege in keeping his officials from testifying at legislative inquiry or the court , even if subpoenaed . The Judiciary in protecting its interest and in maintaining public may ban press people within a courtroom . Cameras inside a court may violate not only the privacy of the judges merely also the privacy of the parties to the...If you want to get a integral essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment