A Discussion Of The Debate Between Herbert Marcusa And Norman Brown

PHILOSOPHICAL OUTLOOKS AND POLEMICS BETWEEN HERBERT MARCUSE AND NORMAN BROWN2004PHILOSOPHICAL OUTLOOKS AND POLEMICS BETWEEN HERBERT MARCUSE AND NORMAN BROWNINTRODUCTIONThe inwardness of XX light speed marked new era in the western philosophical system shaping of modern mass refinement , aftersounds of the bit World War growing opposition amongst companionableistic and capitalistic regimes caused emergence of a so-called second crisis in a western social school of thought . The brightest representatives of that prison term philosophical paradigm were German American philosopher Herbert Marcuse , an offspring of a well-known Frankfurt school and native American philosopher Norman Oliver Brown . They represented two dissimilar approaches in social philosophy . Being a witness of German pot s struggles during Nazi regime Marcuse formed his outlook as a leftist philosopher and sociologist becoming a partisan of a Freudian-Marxist philosophy Pessimistic perspectives of Norman Brown on the contrary resolved his apocalyptical mystical outlooks . These philosophical approaches of two brightest scientists of the last carbon need to be compargond and contrastedMAIN DISCUSSIONDuring the 1960s the philosophical debates between H . Marcuse and N Brown concerning interpretation of Freudian thinkings made a serious impact on the development of social philosophy . As J . Chytry (Chytry , 1989 believes , Norman Brown s and Herbert Marcuse s interpretations of Freud seemed to point to meaning(prenominal) , and opposed , orientations for the New Left [a new paradigm in social sciences during middle XX century] During this period of epoch Freud , as many scientists believe , appeared as the successor to a ` overage , but not yet surpassed , Marxist project (Zaretsky , 2002 . This tidings of Freudian ideas also influenced interpretations of aesthetics , culture and politicsIn the middle of XX century both Marcuse and Brown developed own trance of Freudian ideas in a general philosophical and pagan context Two books of two philosophers written in the 1950 s are captivating explorations of Freud s outlooks and the implications of psychoanalytical ideas of sexuality on human granting immunity .

Herbert Marcuse s Eros and Civilization , published first focused on the role of sexuality in forming of modern civilization and human beings . The second is Life Against Death by Norman O . Brown who developed Freudian idea of suppression and use it to the general civilization s context Generalizing the main ideas of two examinations it s inevitable to mention that both authors focused on remedial cure strategies able to cure diseased beau monde of XX century infected by revolutionary ideas , aggression , intolerance etc . Jewish-Orthodox psychoanalysis as both Brown and Marcuse believed suggests society a principle of reality and ethics of survival . The logics of this survival they , n peerlesstheless , see in different manners . In a word , they stood on different psychological positions according to which society existsThe polemics between Marcuse and Brown wasn t literally a virtual one Being close friends they often criticized philosophical outlooks of one some other afterwards . Nevertheless that both philosophers were troubled with the same idea to help pinched society the visions of such help were different . Marcuse believed in the primacy of progress and technique that is to replace out of time relationships...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper