Analysis of Bandura’s cognitive theory Essay

installation The composition of homo behavior or behaviorism focuses on attri savees of munificence that are discernible, measurable and which can be manipulated. The emphasis of behaviorism is on experimental methods and avoids attributes that are subjective, internal or unavailable. The experimental method involves the employment of one variable and measurement of its effect on an other variable. It is from the study of variable and effects that a Canadian psychologist, Albert Bandura found the cognitive possibility (or social cognitive guess) (Bandura, 2006).Bandura for instance observed aggressive behavior in adolescents and opined that the aggressiveness is caused by the surroundings in which the adolescents grow. On the other hand, he overly realized that behavior causes an milieu as well. Thus, since behavior and environment are causes and effects of each other, Bandura referred to the concept as interchangeable determinism (Bandura1986). In short, Banduras theory wa s based on the fact that the world and a somebodys character (behavior) affect each other (Bandura, 1986). magic spell it would appear that the environment was the cause of behavior and temper, Bandura likewise realized that individualality is an interaction of a persons psychological responses in relation to the environment (Bandura, 2006). The psychological processes consist of the gentle beings office to entertain different images and languages. Thus, the cognitive theory is built on two essential principles.The first one is a framework for explaining how different personalities function, whereas the other one addresses the type of variables (that is the elements of analysis) on which the personality theory should be centred (Bandura, 2006). In analysis of the influence of common determinism, Bandura categorically uses the word determinism to imply the fount in which effects are produced by events (Bandura, 2006). However, this assurance does not slopped that a human b eings actions arise from straightforward and sure chains of cause and consequence.Rather, it implies that events produce effects by chance. As a result, the probability or chance of an event producing an effect is emphasized in Banduras cognitive theory (Bandura, 2006). Perhaps the most significant cyclorama of Banduras theory is the way in which the theory treats behavior. Unlike umpteen other theoretical frameworks, this theory has equal action on both(prenominal) the input of the personality and the output of personality (Bandura, 1986). In essence, Banduras opinion is that a persons actions and the resultant effects shape the persons aptitude, feelings and belief in one self (Bandura, 2006).For example, many behaviouristic theories depict scant curiosity in self-process because the theorists assume that human surgery is caused by external stimulus rather than the internal stimulus which is exclusively considered as transmitting rather than causing behavior (Bandura, 1986). This paper critically evaluates the worthy features of Banduras cognitive theory and discusses in detail the stand of the Bandura at the time of formulation of the theory and the theorys sequent modification.The paper will also appraise the strengths and weaknesses of the theory based on the discussion. Analysis of the salient features of Banduras cognitive theory The most notable feature of Banduras social cognitive theory is the concept of reciprocal determinism (Bandura, 1986). Reciprocal determinism is a phenomenon that implies the causes and effects of different actions on behavior and environment and how they affect each other.Thus, Banduras theory was based on the operate that personal factors in the form of cognition, biological events and affect, behavior and environmental factors arrive at interfaces that result in a triadic reciprocality as illustrated in mannikin 1. Figure 1 The foundation of Banduras (1986) concept of the social cognitive theory. Source Created f rom the description by Bandura (2006) Bandura modified the label of his theory from the parking lot perspective of social learning to social cognitive in battle array to distance it from the common social learning theories of his time (Bandura, 1986).He also wanted to lay emphasis on the idea that cognition plays a significant role in stacks capability to reconstruct reality, regulate their personality, encode information and display other kinds of behavior. According to Bandura (1971), the reciprocal form of the determinants of individual human functioning in social cognitive theory enables services such as therapeutic and counseling efforts to be rendered with focus on personal environment or behavioral factors as illustrated in the diagram above.Based on this, strategies to improve a persons well-being can be aimed at ameliorating the emotional, cognitive and motivational process of the human being (Bandura, 1986). The focus can also be on improving behavioral capabilities or changing the communal conditions under which people live and work. As an example, teachers in schools have a role to not only improve their students academic learning and confidence, but also boost their (students) self-beliefs and habits of thinking.Hence, teachers and students have to embrace all the components of Banduras triadic formulation of cognitive theory. As earlier mentioned, Banduras social cognitive theory sets itself aside from other theories that overemphasize the role played by environmental factors in the development of human behavior (Bandura, 1986 Bandura, 2006). These theories are often pink-slipped since they have the redundant factor of cause and effect that is unworthy in the context of evaluating the psychological aspect of human beings.Thus according to Bandura, psychological science per se without a clear self-examination cannot purport to explain the complexities of human intricacies of human functioning. Bandura (1986) further noted it is by evaluating their own conscious minds that people discern their own psychological processes. Therefore, in order to predict how the human behavior is affected by environmental outcomes, it is imperative that the individuals cognitive process and how he or she interprets the outcomes be understood.